Theologically, of course, there's no need to. Because Jesus does not feature in Judaism - not at all. And yet, if there is one question that Jews living in Xian countries get asked, it is:
What do Jews really think about Jesus...?
The implication almost seems to be that the official Jewish stance is not the whole picture. Some of the more ardent evangelicals in the Xian community are unable to accept that as Jews, we simply don't need Jesus, and we never did.
So for the benefit of any of our Xians reading this, let's clarify:
You could go to every synagogue on planet Earth, and I guarantee, you will never hear Jesus mentioned. Not even once. He is about as relevant to Judaism as, say, Buddha is to Christianity.
Many people find this strange; after all, millions of Christians proclaim Jesus as their 'messiah' and 'saviour'. Why on earth don't Jews themselves attach any importance to this vital, most famous of historical figures?
Well, let's consider the context:
Back when Jesus was busy gallivanting around Judea, declaring himself as 'messiah', the Jews were living under Roman oppression. And it was tough. The Romans had a nasty habit of crucifying people - mainly Jews. Sometimes up to 100 Jews in a single day.
And as at other hard times in Jewish history, the Jews longed for their maschiach. They knew full well he could be right there, in their midst. After all, the Torah makes it clear: the Jewish maschiach is a normal mortal man - he's not 'divine' and he doesn't have supernatural powers. In short: he wouldn't look any different from any other Jewish bloke.
So where was he?
Numerous young Jewish blokes believed themselves to be that messiah. They too sauntered around Jerusalem, their faithful believers scuttling after them and hanging on every word. There was nothing unique about Jesus, he was one of many. Contrary to the way he's portrayed, Jesus was *not* some ancient David Beckham of the middle east, known by all.
Indeed, the vast majority of Jews had no awareness of Jesus. It was only ever a tiny sect that followed him. There were never hordes of Jews following Jesus, despite what some evangelical sources might claim.
Christianity argues that Jesus fulfilled various messianic prophecies. They point to the 'old testament' in a bid to 'prove' this. There's just one problem - the OT is not the Jewish bible. It never has been. Think about it logically: why would Judaism define its own scriptures as 'old'?
The OT is a Christian text. It was produced by the Church and really has no connection with Judaism at all. And while some versions of it are reliable, alas many others are mistranslated and misinterpreted distortions of the Tanakh. Certainly all OTs are wrongly organised, as the Church inserted 'chapter breaks' where none exist in the original Hebrew.
So when Jews and Christians discuss the 'Jewish bible' they are usually referring to two entirely different texts.
And since, for the most part, Jews read the Tanakh in the original Hebrew, we are bemused when some Christians state that we are ourselves are somehow 'misinterpreting' it, when we explain to them that no, Jesus does not get a mention in the Tanakh.
Christianity ignores something else when it insists, as it still does, that the Jews have 'rejected' Jesus and 'missed' their own messiah.
They ignore that the very idea of 'messiah' originated with Judaism. The messianic prophecies and description of the maschiach were written in Hebrew, by Jews, for Jews.
It seems logical to conclude that the people who first described the messiah, the people who studied the Hebrew scriptures, the people who read the messianic prophecies in Hebrew, were sufficiently intelligent to identify their own messiah.
But no. Christianity says not. On the contrary, the Christian bible calls Jews 'ignorant' and 'blinded' for their refusal to name Jesus as messiah.
And historically, Christianity has always gone a step further. It has suggested that Jews managed, bizarrely, to misunderstand the Jewish bible!
One of the most well known examples of this is when Isaiah - according to Christianity - describes a 'virgin birth'. A clear reference to Mary and Jesus, insist Christians. A clear prophecy concerning the birth of Jesus. A clear example of Jews misinterpreting their own bible.
There's just one problem. The Hebrew does not support this theory.
Isaiah uses the word 'almah'. This means 'young woman'. It has *always* meant 'young woman'. It has never meant 'virgin'. If Isaiah had wanted to say 'virgin' he would have used an entirely different Hebrew word: 'betulah'.
Happily, the traditional Christian stance on this seems to be softening. Recently, a few Christian bibles have been amended and brought into line with the original Hebrew. Here they are:
Recent altered Christian Translations of Isaiah 7:14
Revised Standard Version: Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Revised English Bible Because you do, the Lord of his own accord will give you a sign; it is this: A young woman is with child, and she will give birth to a son and call him Immanuel.
New English Bible Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign: A young woman is with child, and she will bear a son, and will call him Immanuel.
New Revised Standard Version: Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel.
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures(Jehovah Witnesses) Therefore Jehovah himself will give you men a sign: Look! The maiden herself will actually become pregnant, and she is giving birth to a son, and she will certainly call his name Immanuel.
Good News Bible: Well then, the Lord himself will give you a sign: A young woman who is pregnant will have a son and will name him "Immanuel."
The Jerusalem Bible: Readers Edition The Lord himself, therefore, will give you a sign. It is this: The maiden is with child and will soon give birth to a son whom she will call Immanuel.
The Bible: A New Translation An omen you shall have, and that from the Eternal himself. There is a young woman with child, who shall bear a son and call his name "Immanuel" (God is with us).
The Bible: An American Translation:Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold! A young woman is with child, and is about to bear a son; and she will call him "God is with us."
The International Critical Commentary:Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a damsel is with child, and shall bring forth a son, and call his name Immanuel.
The New Jerusalem Bible: The Lord will give you a sign in any case. It is this: The young woman is with child and will give birth to a son whom she will call Immanuel.
The Layman's Bible Commentary: In reply, Isaiah says that the Lord will provide a sign. It will be a most unusual and remarkable event. A young woman shall bear a son and name him "Immanuel," meaning "God is with us."
World Biblical Commentary: Therefore my Lord himself will give you (pl) a sign. Behold, the woman shall conceive and bearing a son -- she shall call his name "Immanuel."
The Bible in Basic English: For this cause the Lord himself will give you a sign; a young woman is now with child, and she will give birth to a son, and she will give him the name Immanuel.
Thus many Christian authorities now admit that there is nothing about a 'virgin birth' in Isaiah - or indeed anywhere else in the Tanakh. Why would there be? The idea is totally alien to Judaism.
The Jewish G-d NEVER takes human form - and certainly doesn't pop in to planet earth to quickly impregnate young Jewish chicks!!!
And there are other reasons why Jesus was not the Jewish Maschiach, quite apart from this. Jesus did not fulfill any of the Jewish messianic prophecies.
The Jewish Maschiach must:
- usher in world peace
- unite all Jews in Israel
- bring Torah to all the nations
- rebuild the temple
- REJECT doing miracles
- redeem Israel, and the world
- be from King David's line
- create G-d's kingdom, here on earth.
Now, did Jesus fulfill anyof these before he died?
Answer: No. Not a single one.
Conclusion: Jesus was not, indeed could not have been, the Jewish maschiach.
To reiterate a key point: the concept of 'messiah' is a Jewish concept. Judaism was the first faith to articulate the idea. Christianity has revised the definition of 'messiah' so much that now, many Christians don't even know that their messiah bears *no* relation to the original Jewish Maschiach.
So, what do Jews think about Jesus?
Well, there's no official line on him. Some Jews probably doubt he ever existed at all - remember, Jesus is not mentioned by any of the contemporary writers of his own time.
Many Jews regard Jesus as a young, charismatic preacher who sought to reform Judaism - but who never intended to 'start' a new faith. Jesus lived and died a practising Jew. He taught basic Judaism. 'Love Thy Neighbour' appears first in the holy Jewish text, the Torah, thousands of years before the Church began using this message.
Most Jews, though, don't think about Jesus at all. He simply is not relevant to Judaism.
And he certainly was not our maschiach.
In short, then, Jesus was just a Nice Jewish Boy. And let's face it - if ever he should somehow return, he'd head straight for the nearest synagogue..
0 comments:
Post a Comment